Soccer Mom: Unplugged

raves, rants, reviews and recounts of life in middle America

2006/9/11

A point by point rebuttal: "Screw Loose Change"

@ 05:32 PM (27 months, 5 days ago)

Click the blue words to watch it for yourself.  (Better Dugg? ;-)

 

Comment(s) »

  1. Wonderful memorial, Cate, thank you!

    :roll: Loose Change... My hubby and I reluctantly watched that thing a few months ago, and I must've saw red for days! Besides, liberal science isn't hard to debunk...:wink:

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/09/11 @ 05:50 PM — (Reply)

  2. You guys have NO answers to any of the questions the film poses - all you can do is call it garbage and lib(? - has nothing to do with libs)viewpoint.
    Watch it for yourself and you will see.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/11 @ 06:18 PM — (Reply)

  3. I watched Loose Change half a year ago when I told you I would. Your turn. Watch "Screw Loose Change", Dugg. Put your money where your mouth is.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/11 @ 07:23 PM — (Reply)

  4. Didn't realize it was a link or a movie (doh)- I thought you were just saying it.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/11 @ 07:26 PM — (Reply)

  5. It's okay, Dugg. Happens to the best of us ;-)

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/11 @ 07:32 PM — (Reply)

  6. Well - with all due respect - I watched 2 minutes of it and the guy correcting already seems like adesperate jackass. The operation Northwoods wasn't meant to be connected to 911 - only to show prior case evidence of the government planning the exact same kind of attack. The corrector in this film doesn't bother to address that this evidence is real- only tries to spin the fact by saying its not connected to 911. Come on, Cate. This is spin central desperation. I'll watch the rest tomorrow if you really want me to - but I'm pretty sure I'll be able to rip on every point they make.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/11 @ 07:33 PM — (Reply)

  7. Hve you gotten far enough in (just a few minutes) to see the photos of plane parts (including sides of the airliner with windows) at WTC?

    Gotta wonder how that suddenly appeared with all of America watching - what happened to the windowless military aircraft... you know, blue logo...

    Watch it, Dugg.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/11 @ 07:50 PM — (Reply)

  8. The site Screwloosechange has a lot of answers and other debunking links. Dugg the onus is on the tinfoil hat brigade to prove their point, not the other way around..I am afraid to date the backyard scientists havent' done anything but look like a Saturday morning cartoon.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 10:40 AM — (Reply)

  9. Where's the planes at the pentagon and shanksville? Every airline plane wreck in history has had every fragment found put back together to try and solve the cause of the wrecks - were are these? Better yet - where are the photos of the wrecks?? How do you prove something wasn't there except to show the pics that prove - nothings there but a tiny hole? What more could you want or possibly ask for beside photographic evedince? Tons of it. From multiple sources.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/12 @ 10:47 AM — (Reply)

  10. We celebrated the advent of manned flight for 100 years just this past 2003. while commercial flight is usually the most devastating in a crash it is not always possible to recover "reconstructable" parts, that has always been too cost prohibitive. in the twa 800 that crash is noted by history of AV crash invest. the most expensive "EVER" and the first to be so. Some other events of large aircraft crash (military) have also been noted that "PARTS" were so small "THEY WERE UNRECOGNISABLE AS HAVING ONCE EVER BELONGED TO AN AIRPLANE" AT ALL.

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/09/12 @ 01:15 PM — (Reply)

  11. did you not read my comment on your blog where the people recovering were finding pieces of the plane? How do you explain the people on the planes calling their loved ones or calling operators and explaining about the hijackers? Did the NSA tap all their phones and then find someone in the government whose voice sounded just like their loved ones?

    Dugg you might as well spit in the face of every government servant...it's unreasonable. I suggest therapy for your paranoia.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 10:52 AM — (Reply)

  12. Back to name calling... every question you just posed is answered in the real loose change.

    I suggest you look at both sides with an open mind and not just with the mind to disprove everything.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/12 @ 11:22 AM — (Reply)

  13. you suggested on Barry's blog the other day that you might be paranoid. I am only confirming it.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 01:02 PM — (Reply)

  14. I'm not the one who only watched two minutes of screwloosechange.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 12:41 PM — (Reply)

  15. How about an eyewitness account :

    Having seen my share of plane crashes and leaping to the earlier events of the day, it was clear in my mind what had just happened – we’d been hit, probably with an airliner just like the WTC.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 01:01 PM — (Reply)

  16. Just where is Dugg today?

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/12 @ 01:52 PM — (Reply)

  17. I watched most of it. I disagree totally with it - its sorta like watching Loose Change with Baaaahrry talking over it. Someone desperate to shoot down everything in the movie with no rebuttal. BTW - Loose Change isn't the only 911 conspiracy movie - there is probably dozens at this point - many of the best ones are linked under the movie tag on my page. Loose Change doesn't even touch on all the oddities of the day - just most of them.
    Too much smoke not be fire.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/12 @ 02:25 PM — (Reply)

  18. Sounds like backpedaling to me, Dugg.



    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/12 @ 04:07 PM — (Reply)

  19. and the phone calls dugg?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 04:20 PM — (Reply)

  20. Hey, Dugg. Did you catch Glenn Beck on CNN last night? He had the editor from Popular Mechanics on (whose name escapes me) who has written an entire book debunking Loose Change.

    Like the infamous "It looked like a cruise missile with wings" quote... It can be easily debunked by playing the entire news clip, wherein the reporter said it was a plane about three times before he made the analogy of the "missile with wings."

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/09/12 @ 06:09 PM — (Reply)

  21. I too am glad this memorial is over!! I looked up one day on WEB MD and found the symptoms of my anxiety are particular to someone who has suffered "CATASTROPHIC SHOCK" , I SHOULD SUE THE MEDIA FOR EXPOSING ME TO THE ALL DAY AND ALL NIGHT REPORTING OF THE EVENTS OF 9/11 AND DEMAND FINANCIAL COMP BY THE ARAB GOVERNMENT AND THE FAMILIES OF THOSE WHO COMMITTED THIS ACT AND CAUSED MY MENTAL ANXIETY....HOW I FELL DISTRESSED WHEN IN A CROWD OF MID EASTERNERS FROM THESE MURDEROUS COUNTRIES...HHMMM

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/09/12 @ 06:46 PM — (Reply)

  22. I smell class action lawsuit aza

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 07:04 PM — (Reply)

  23. I smell class action lawsuit aza

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/12 @ 07:44 PM — (Reply)

  24. Looks like poor ol ul dugg got worn down.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/09/13 @ 08:57 PM — (Reply)

  25. Great site, EB!! Thanks for the link.

    I had my own qualms about "Loose Change" when they made a blatant factual error. In the 'confession video,' Osama is seen eating and writing with his right hand, while documentation indicates that Osama is left-handed. The movie alarmingly points to this as evidence that the man in the video can't be Osama. But that's because the producers didn't do even basic research: In Arab culture, the left hand is associated with ... hygenic functions. It's incredibly rude and disgusting to eat or write with the left hand in their culture, so ANY left-handed Arab would be seen eating with their right.

    Glad to see that others don't hop on to the alarmist bandwagon without first checking the facts a little.

    Comment by Michael— 2006/09/18 @ 08:02 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are over 25 comments to this post, your eventual comment will no longer trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically