Soccer Mom: Unplugged

raves, rants, reviews and recounts of life in middle America

2006/1/26

What NARAL and NOW don't want you to know...

Tags:
@ 10:33 AM (34 months, 11 days ago)

For so long now, the radical pro-choice forces in America have described anyone pro-life as a right wing nutcase.  They want you to believe that anyone who opposes state sanctioned abortion (and the expenditure of our tax dollars for it) is a person who would kill doctors and blow up clinics.  This idea is completely false. 

True there is a mentally ill right fringe.  There is also a left fringe that may (or may not) benefit from electro-shock therapy.  Some on that end will kill humans to protect trees and chickens.  Either way killing to enforce your ideology is WRONG.

The simple truth of the matter is that most moral conservatives object to ELECTIVE abortions.  Our objection is not with rape victims, victims of incest, mothers whose lives are endangered by childbirth.  The problem we see is in condoning (and paying for) abortions for people who were just too lazy or stupid to purchase a condom. 

YOUR failure to plan does not constitute MY emergency. 

I understand that many pro-choice activists spout false concern for the unborn by proposing that it is better to abort an unwanted fetus (or blastocyst - if you catch it early enough) than to bring a child into the world who would be unwanted and probably uncared for.  Aside from the very viable option of adoption, there is the simple truth that any mother can tell you.  Many pregnancies that are unwanted at first, produce beautiful children that you can't help but love from the minute their little legs kick inside your womb.  In fact, that maternal instinct that NARAL would deny the existence of, kicks in so often that by month nine and after hours of labor, many young women who planned to give up those "unwanted" children find themselves struggling to follow through with that decision.

Due to complications with my pregnancies, I was fortunate to become very well acquainted with a wonderful ultrasound tech in the military hospital where two of my sons were born.  She confided during one of my many visits that most of the women who came in for "dating" (to find out exact gestational age of the fetus) were young african american soldiers who wanted abortions.  She also told me that most came in regularly and that she had seen one patient 7 times.  (Now to give you an idea - the Army moves people roughly every 3 years so that's 7 times in 3 years.)  They were simply put, using the abortion procedure as a form of tax sponsored birth control. (What's really sad is that the military hospital prescribes condoms, the pill, almost any birth control - to include IUDs for FREE!)

THIS IS WHAT WE ARE OPPOSED TO!   Elective abortions. 

The truth is I believe free-will is one of the most undeniable of human rights.  I am fiercely pro-choice.  But I believe the choice is made BEFORE you have sex not AFTER.

Comment(s) »

  1. Give me a break. If everything should be OUR-CHOICE/PRO-CHOICE then would any of us ever have had a GYN exam? Life begins at conception. The second that the sperm and egg meet to form a new "being", is the second the choice is no longer that of the host. How dare anyone assume that a child has the right to choose to have an abortion. Would you let them have plastic surgery without your consent? Or would you as a parent not treat their illnesses? No. You make those decisions because they are not yet at a level of education and maturity to make wise and informed choices. (that's why we don't let them drive) And as for abortion verses adoption. As a victim of rape, I chose adoption. I gave my child an opportunity to be in a loving home. I did not, flush it down the toilet. For all of you PRO-CHOICE people, go and watch an abortion. See the living, independently moving, fetus as it is ripped from the womb. When it takes an outside force to remove life from a fetus, it is murder. When miscarriages and other internal things remove life from a fetus, it is simply a tragic death, an accident of nature. No life should be taken. Abortion is not "humane euthinization" (sp) of unwanted or unviable beings, as I have heard it called. We are not animals. If you "do it like dogs" then suffer the consequenses like animals do. Bear the burden of your actions.... and then get yourself "fixed".

    Comment by Verity— 2006/01/26 @ 01:08 PM — (Reply)



  2. The simple truth of the matter is that most moral conservatives object to ELECTIVE abortions. Our objection is not with rape victims, victims of incest, mothers whose lives are endangered by childbirth. The problem we see is in condoning (and paying for) abortions for people who were just too lazy or stupid to purchase a condom.


    You're right soccer mom, approximately .4% of abortions are due to rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. That means that 99%+ are for the convenience of the mother.

    Martin Brasheer recently interviewed an abortion entrepreneur who mentioned just how proud he was to be doing his work and mentioned one woman who had had the procedure 9 times- 9 TIMES.

    If there is any question shouldn't we be on the side of life?

    Verity thanks for sharing your story. I am sorry for what you have been through and I commend you for your decision.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/01/26 @ 08:58 PM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically